Last reviewed: 27 October 2026. The Dutch surgical curriculum is currently in transition: SCHERP 3.0 is proposed to take effect on 1 April 2027, subject to completion of the regulatory process described below.
For an international doctor looking at the Netherlands, the hardest part to understand is that “getting into surgery” is not one application. It is a chain. Your medical diploma has to be recognised through the route that applies to you. You need the legal registration that allows you to work as a doctor. You need enough Dutch to function clinically. Then you still have to compete for an AIOS heelkunde position — a formal surgical training post.
That distinction matters. A doctor can spend months solving the licensing problem and still be nowhere near a surgical training number. Conversely, building an impressive surgical CV before understanding whether your diploma can be recognised is putting the steps in the wrong order.
The short version
As of October 2026, doctors with foreign qualifications must have the qualification officially recognised before entering the BIG register. The exact recognition route depends heavily on where and what you studied. Certain designated EU/EEA or Swiss medical diplomas can use automatic recognition with direct BIG registration; other European qualifications generally use recognition of professional qualifications; doctors with qualifications from outside the EU/Switzerland generally follow the certificate-of-competence route. Dutch-language proficiency is part of the registration process.
BIG registration is not the same thing as acceptance into surgical training. The BIG register itself states that registration allows a doctor to begin specialist training, but the actual surgical post is a separate competitive selection process.

Step 1: work out which recognition route applies to your medical degree
The Dutch BIG-register currently describes three broad recognition routes for foreign healthcare diplomas. This is one of those situations where nationality alone is not enough to tell you the answer; the diploma, country of qualification and individual circumstances matter.
Route A: designated European diplomas
For doctors with specifically designated diplomas from the European Economic Area or Switzerland, automatic recognition and BIG registration can be handled in one procedure. The BIG-register says that assessment of a complete application in this route usually takes no more than three months.
Route B: other EU or Swiss qualifications
If a European qualification is not eligible for automatic recognition, the recognition-of-professional-qualifications route may apply. The current BIG guidance gives a processing period of up to 12 weeks after a complete application is received, with a possible one-month extension.
Route C: non-EU qualifications
For a medical diploma obtained outside the EU or Switzerland, the route is generally a certificate of competence. The Commission for Foreign Healthcare Graduates (CBGV) can advise on whether the applicant’s knowledge and skills are equivalent to the Dutch level.
This is also where a major 2026 change matters. The BIG-register reported a long waiting time for the professional-content examination for physicians. From 1 March 2026, the clinical-knowledge component of the physician BI test was temporarily removed; the test still includes the interuniversity progress test and clinical-skills component. The reason given was the growth in non-European applications and limited examination capacity. For a doctor planning a move, that is not trivia — it can affect the timeline substantially.
Step 2: BIG registration is the legal gateway, not a residency acceptance
The BIG register is the statutory register for regulated healthcare professions in the Netherlands. For doctors, registration protects the professional title and is tied to the authority to perform reserved medical acts independently. A foreign-trained doctor needs an officially recognised qualification and must meet the registration conditions, including language proficiency and professional-conduct requirements.
For applicants coming from systems where “medical licence” and “residency match” happen close together, this can be confusing. In the Netherlands, think of BIG registration as permission to participate in the medical labour market as a doctor. It does not award you an AIOS position.
Step 3: Dutch is not an optional extra
The BIG-register explicitly requires proof of sufficient Dutch-language proficiency for registration in the relevant foreign-diploma routes. But the practical standard of a surgical department is bigger than passing a language document.
A surgical resident has to take a history from a patient who is frightened or in pain, understand a nurse’s concern over the phone, present quickly on rounds, explain consent, read local documentation, communicate deterioration and follow a rapid discussion in theatre. That is why language preparation should be treated as clinical preparation rather than immigration paperwork.
This is similar to the reality described in our guide to starting surgical training in Germany as an international doctor: formal recognition opens the door, but day-to-day credibility is built through communication and clinical reliability.
Step 4: understand what you are actually applying for
The formal trainee is an AIOS — arts in opleiding tot specialist, a doctor in specialist training. A doctor working clinically outside a formal specialist-training position is commonly described as an ANIOS — arts niet in opleiding tot specialist.
That difference is important for international applicants. Getting a hospital job and getting a recognised surgical training position are not interchangeable achievements. An ANIOS job can provide Dutch clinical experience, references and a much clearer view of whether the system fits you, but it should not be described as if it automatically converts into surgical specialist training.
What surgical selection currently asks for
The Dutch Society for Surgery (NVvH) publishes practical information for applicants. Its current FAQ states that applications to the regional training committees (ROC’s) should include a CV, up to four references with contact details — including specified reference types — and BIG registration. That tells you something important about the selection culture: legal eligibility is only one line in the file. Programs also want evidence from people who have actually watched you work.
For an international doctor, the useful question is therefore not simply, “How do I make my CV longer?” It is, “What evidence will let a Dutch surgical department judge me?” Recent, credible clinical references; demonstrated communication; familiarity with the local system; and evidence that you function reliably in a team are more interpretable than a pile of unrelated certificates.

What the training itself looks like
The NVvH’s current education structure is organised across training years 1 through 6. Its 2026–2027 course schedule includes national CASH teaching, twice-yearly knowledge testing, and courses such as trauma and critical-care training early in the programme. The exact educational architecture is now moving toward a major revision.
On 26 October 2026, the College Geneeskundige Specialismen (CGS) announced that it had approved a revised national surgical training plan, SCHERP 3.0, as part of a draft regulatory process. The proposed implementation date is 1 April 2027.
The change is meaningful. According to the CGS announcement, the revised plan removes the mandatory differentiation structure, introduces general and elective Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), and places greater emphasis on contemporary and societal themes. The associated draft surgical decision also adds provisions concerning evening, night and weekend duties and removes some recognition requirements for training programmes and institutions.
Crucially, this is not yet something applicants should describe as settled law. As of 27 October 2026, the surgical decision is in the advisory phase. Relevant parties can provide advice until 28 December 2026, and the KNMG regulation page labels SCHERP 3.0 as future regulation with the intended 1 April 2027 start dependent on the specific decision.
Why the EPA change matters from inside training
An EPA-based curriculum changes the language of progression. Instead of treating a year of training or a raw case count as proof that somebody can do a job, an EPA asks whether the trainee can be entrusted with a defined professional activity at an appropriate level of supervision.
That does not magically make training objective. Trust is still built by repeated performance: preparing properly, knowing when to ask for help, communicating clearly, closing loops and showing that feedback changes what you do next time. Those are the same mechanisms we discuss in how surgical residents actually earn operative autonomy.
For an IMG, this can be especially important. You may arrive with operative experience that does not map neatly onto Dutch expectations. The question is not only, “Have you done this before?” It is whether the local training team can entrust you to perform the activity within its own system.
The part nobody can solve with paperwork
International applications often get discussed as bureaucracy: diploma, translation, registration, language certificate, CV. Those are necessary. But surgical training is ultimately a workplace relationship.
You need people who trust you with a sick patient at 03:00, who believe your handover, who know you will call when the situation exceeds your level, and who are willing to increase your responsibility in theatre. That takes time in any country. Moving countries adds a second learning curve because you are learning the clinical culture at the same time as the specialty.
If you do enter a Dutch department before formal surgical training, use that period deliberately. Learn how rounds run. Learn who makes which decisions. Learn the documentation culture. Learn how escalation works. Ask for specific feedback. Keep track of what you are being trusted to do rather than assuming time served equals progression. Our guides on learning a new surgical service quickly and getting useful feedback in residency apply almost perfectly here.

A realistic order of operations for an international applicant
First, identify your recognition route. Use the official BIG-register advice tools rather than assuming that another doctor’s pathway applies to your diploma.
Second, treat Dutch as a clinical skill. Build it early enough that language is not the bottleneck after diploma recognition.
Third, obtain BIG registration. This is the legal gateway to practising as a doctor and to beginning specialist training.
Fourth, understand the regional surgical selection process. Read the current NVvH applicant requirements and build references that allow a selection committee to assess your actual clinical work.
Fifth, separate “working in surgery” from “being in surgical training.” If you take an ANIOS post, know exactly what it is giving you and what it is not.
Finally, re-check the curriculum before applying for 2027. SCHERP 3.0 is moving through the regulatory process now. The proposed start date is 1 April 2027, but applicants should verify the final rules rather than relying on an October 2026 snapshot.
Bottom line
The Netherlands is not a shortcut around specialist selection. For an international doctor, the pathway is better understood as four separate hurdles: recognition, BIG registration, local clinical credibility, and selection into an AIOS surgical post.
The good news is that the pathway is legible once those stages are separated. The official recognition system tells you what is required to practise. The NVvH publishes what it expects from surgical applicants. And the national curriculum makes the training structure visible — including a substantial proposed redesign for 2027.
If you are comparing countries, also see our current guides to surgical training in Switzerland, UK surgical training for international doctors, and general surgery training in Canada for IMGs.
Sources and further reading
- BIG-register — Recognition of foreign diplomas
- BIG-register — Registration requirements
- BIG-register — 2026 change to the BI test for physicians
- KNMG/CGS — Draft surgical training decision and SCHERP 3.0, 26 October 2026
- KNMG/CGS — Current and future surgery regulations
- NVvH — Surgical postgraduate education and current course structure
- NVvH — Surgical training FAQs and application documentation



Leave a Reply